References related to Chengchuan Liu's Project
paper #1:
[55]
RakhimovEtAl CommAlg 2010 34pp
(here)
Review of [55]
(here)
A paper citing [55]:
[59] RakhimovEtAl IJAC 2011 15pp
(here)
Review of [59]
(here)
Another paper citing [55]:
On derivations of some classes of Leibniz algebras
Rakhimov, Isamiddin S.; Al-Nashri, Al-Hossain;
J. Gen. Lie Theory Appl. 6 (2012), 12 pp.
(here)
Review of:
On derivations of some classes of Leibniz algebras
Rakhimov, Isamiddin S.; Al-Nashri, Al-Hossain;
J. Gen. Lie Theory Appl. 6 (2012), 12 pp.
(here)
paper #2:
Central extensions of null-filiform and naturally graded filiform non-Lie Leibniz algebras
Adashev, J. K.; Camacho, L. M.; Omirov, B. A.;
J. Algebra 479 (2017), 461-486.
(here)
Review of
Central extensions of null-filiform and naturally graded filiform non-Lie Leibniz algebras
Adashev, J. K.; Camacho, L. M.; Omirov, B. A.;
J. Algebra 479 (2017), 461-486.
(here)
Questions related to Chengchuan Liu's Project
Question on October 9
"Can you clarify the defintions of filiform and grL in [55]?"
(my answer here)
Questions on October 17 and my answers
1. Do I need to care about the proofs of Theorem 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 in [55]?
ANSWER: NO. They are proved in other papers and stated here for reference.
2. Theorem 2.1 says a complex (n+1)-dimensional naturally graded
filiform Leibniz algebra is isomorphic to NGF1, can I say that this
algebra will not be isomorphic to NGF2 and NGF3?
ANSWER: In Theorem 2.1 it is stated that the three types are non-isomorphic.
3. From the definition of G_ad, G_ad is a "closed subgroup of GL(V)", so
does it mean that all five isomorphisms are group isomorphisms?
ANSWER:
GL(V) is the set of invertible linear transformation of the vector space V. So every element
of GL(V) takes a basis to another basis. G_ad consists of those elements of GL(V) which take each adapted basis to another adapted basis.
GL(V) is a group under composition of linear transformations
(See your question 4). G_ad is a subgroup. (you can ignore the word "closed")
For the definition of adapted basis, see definition 3.1 and theorem 2.5 in [8], which is attached.
To answer your question, all elements of GL(V) are isomorphisms of the abelian group consisting of the vector space V under addition of vectors, so in that sense the answer is yes.
4. In Proposition 3.1, what is the meaning of the circle? I guess it acts as the same
function as f(g), but I don't know if this is correct.
ANSWER: Yes, you are correct.
It is composition of linear transformations (we have called this multiplication of linear transformations)
(reference [8] here)