The fundamental processes of DNA synthesis, mitosis and cell division in eukaryotic cells are controlled by a complex network of interacting genes and proteins focused on periodic activation of a family of master regulators, the cyclin-dependent protein kinases (CDKs). This regulatory network must ensure the strict alternation of DNA synthesis (S phase) and mitosis (M phase) and the proper coordination of cell division with cell growth. Moreover, the control system must operate robustly in the face of considerable molecular noise that is unavoidable in the small confines of a yeast cell. After reviewing the basic molecular biology of the CDK regulatory network in budding yeast, I will examine the physiological consequences of the reaction mechanism by mathematical and computational modeling. Deterministic models (differential equations) describe the average behavior of populations of yeast cells, and stochastic models address issues of variability and robustness in individual cells. Both types of models will be evaluated in light of quantitative experimental observations.
The ability of eukaryotic cells to polarize is essential for their division, differentiation into distinct tissues, and migration. During polarization various polarity proteins segregate to form a distinct front and rear. To understand a mechanism for polarization we consider a simplified PDE model describing the interchange of a polarity protein, between an active membrane-bound form and an inactive cytosolic form. An initial transient signal results in a traveling front of activation that stops at some point in the domain, representing segregation of the cell into front and back. Using phase plane methods and numerical continuation we analyze the transition from a spatially heterogeneous (pinned wave) to a spatially homogeneous steady state as the ratio of the diffusion coefficients of the two forms and the total amount of material in the domain is varied. We discover a second spatially heterogeneous solution that acts as a threshold for polarity establishment, and give biological interpretation for this phenomenon.
Traveling waves in actin have recently been reported in many cell types. Fish keratocyte cells, which usually exhibit rapid and steady motility, exhibit traveling waves of protrusion when plated on highly adhesive surfaces. We hypothesize that waving arises from a competition between actin polymerization and mature adhesions for VASP, a protein that associates with growing actin barbed ends. We developed a mathematical model of actin protrusion coupled with membrane tension, adhesions and VASP. The model is formulated as a system of partial differential equations with a nonlocal integral term and noise. Simulations of this model lead to a number of predictions, for example, that overexpression of VASP prevents waving, but depletion of VASP does not increase the fraction of cells that wave. The model also predicts that VASP exhibits a traveling wave whose peak is out of phase with the F-actin wave. Further experiments confirmed these predictions and provided quantitative data to estimate the model parameters. We thus conclude that the waves are the result of competition between actin and adhesions for VASP, rather than a regulatory biochemical oscillator or mechanical tag-of-war. We hypothesize that this waving behavior contributes to adaptation of cell motility mechanisms in perturbed environments.
I'll start with definitions and basic properties of Brauer-Grothendieck groups and Brauer-Manin sets of algebraic varieties. After that I'll discuss several finiteness results for these groups with special reference to the case of abelian varieties and K3 surfaces.
This is a report on joint work with Alexei Skorobogatov.
We study the map that sends a monic degree n complex polynomial f(x) without multiple roots to the collection of n values of its derivative at the roots of f(x). It turns out that the differential (tangent map) of this map always has rank n-1.
I will discuss the problem of global well-posedness for equivariant
Scroedinger Maps with energy below the natural threshold both in the focusing (maps to S^2) and defocusing case (maps to H^2).