In the first part of this talk I will do a brief introduction to the recent theory of Mean Field Games (MFG) initiated by J.-M. Lasry and P.-L. Lions. The main objective of the MFG theory is the study of the limit behavior of Nash equilibria for symmetric differential games with a very large number of “small” players. In its simplest form, as the number of players tends to infinity, limits of Nash equilibria can be characterized in terms of the solution of a coupled system of a Hamilton-Jacobi and Fokker-Planck (or continuity) equations. The first equation describes the evolution of the value function of a typical agent, while the second one characterizes the evolution of the agents’ density. In the second part, I will introduce a variational MFG model, where we impose a density constraint. From the modeling point of view, imposing this new constraint means that we are aiming to avoid congestion among the agents. We will see that a weak solution of the system contains an extra term, an additional price imposed on the saturated zones. I will show that this price corresponds to the pressure field from the models of incompressible Euler equations à la Brenier. If time permits, I will discuss the regularity properties of the pressure variable, which allows us to write optimality conditions at the level of single-agent trajectories and to define a weak notion of Nash equilibrium for our model. The talk is based on a joint work with P. Cardaliaguet (Paris Dauphine) and F. Santambrogio (Paris-Sud, Orsay).
The framework of the Weil conjectures establishes a correspondence between the arithmetic of varieties over finite fields and the topology of the corresponding complex varieties. Many varieties of interest arise in sequences, and a natural extension of the Weil conjectures asks for a relationship between the asymptotic point count of the sequence over finite fields and the limiting topology of the sequence over C. In this talk, I'll recall the Weil conjectures and explain the basic idea of these possible extensions. I'll then give a survey of ongoing efforts to understand and exploit this relationship, including Ellenberg-Venkatesh-Westerland's proof of the Cohen-Leinstra heuristics for function fields, a ``best possible'' form of this relationship in the example of configuration spaces of varieties (joint with Benson Farb), and a counterexample to this principle coming from classical work of Borel and recent work of Lipnowski-Tsimerman.
Abstract:
Self-expanding solutions of curvature flows evolve by homothetic expansions under the flow. Rotational symmetric examples are constructed by Ecker-Huisken, Angenent-Chopp-Ilmanen, Helmensdorfer et. al for the Mean Curvature Flow, and by Huisken-Ilmanen, Grugan-Lee-Wheeler et. al for the Inverse Mean Curvature Flow. Many known examples are asymptotic to some standard models such as round cylinders and round cones. In this talk, the speaker will talk about rotational rigidity results for self-expanders of both Mean Curvature and Inverse Mean Curvature Flows, proving that certain self-expanders asymptotic to cones or cylinders are necessarily rotational symmetric. These are joint works with Peter McGrath, and with Gregory Drugan and Hojoo Lee.
The classical Sylvester-Gallai theorem states the following: Given a finite set of points in the 2-dimensional Euclidean plane, not all collinear, there must exist a line containing exactly 2 points (referred to as an ordinary line). In a recent result, Green and Tao were able to give optimal lower bounds on the number of ordinary lines for large finite point sets.
In this talk we will consider the situation over the complex numbers. While the Sylvester-Gallai theorem as stated is false in the complex plane, Kelly's theorem states that if a finite point set in 3-dimensional complex space is not contained in a plane, then there must exist an ordinary line. Using techniques developed for bounding ranks of design matrices, we will show that either such a point set must determine at least 3n/2 ordinary lines or at least n-1 of the points are contained in a plane. (Joint work with Z. Dvir, S. Saraf and C.Wolf.)
Integrable PDEs are a special class of PDEs for which many local and global properties are known. Perhaps the most famous of the solutions of an integrable PDE is its soliton solution, leading to these equations being referred to as soliton equations. The importance of integrable equations derives from the understanding we gain from them about the dynamics of more general nonlinear PDEs.
Geometric analysis in differential geometry is a powerful tool in Riemannian geometry. It has been used to solve many problems in Riemannian geometry. In the field of several complex variables, it was not the most popular weapon to attack questions. One of the reasons is that many problems in the several complex variables relates to some types of differential equations of complex-valued functions which is currently not well understood. In this talk, we consider problems in the Diederich-Forn\ae ss index with a viewpoint of geometric analysis and see what we obtain. This is a joint work with Krantz and Peloso.
We propose a weak Galerkin (WG) finite element method for 2- and 3-dimensional convection-diffusion-reaction problems on conforming or nonconforming polygon/polyhedral meshes. The WG method uses piecewise-polynomial approximations of degree $k(k\ge 0)$ for both the scalar function and its trace on the inter-element boundaries. We show that the method is robust in the sense that the derived a priori error estimates is uniform with respect to the coefficients for sufficient smooth true solutions. Numerical experiments confirm the theoretical results.
Some prominent conjectures in the theory of C*-algebras ask whether or not every C*-algebra of a particular form embeds into an ultrapower of a particular C*-algebra. For example, the Kirchberg Embedding Problem asks whether every C*-algebra embeds into an ultrapower of the Cuntz algebra O_2. In this series of lectures, we show how techniques from model theory, most notably model-theoretic forcing, can be used to give nontrivial reformulations of these conjectures. We will start from scratch, assuming no knowledge of C*-algebras nor model theory.
Some prominent conjectures in the theory of C*-algebras ask whether or not every C*-algebra of a particular form embeds into an ultrapower of a particular C*-algebra. For example, the Kirchberg Embedding Problem asks whether every C*-algebra embeds into an ultrapower of the Cuntz algebra O_2. In this series of lectures, we show how techniques from model theory, most notably model-theoretic forcing, can be used to give nontrivial reformulations of these conjectures. We will start from scratch, assuming no knowledge of C*-algebras nor model theory.